Story on knowledge management and tools
March 11th, 2008 by managermindI just wanna tell a story from a life. The story is about luck in the understanding of the importance of tools by self-confident managers.
Knowledge Management
Several month ago I was in a meeting, where some managers and some consultants where discussing about some IT topics. One of the question that is always present on such meeting (these meetings happens usually every week) is how we can distribute the knowledge of specialists over all team member and keep it up to date.
It is clear that such niche wisdom e.g. some technical guidance must be written down otherwise it is lost. So the next question that should appear is where to write it down. However I was very stunned how airy all team members answers that question inner or loud.
The typical and “simplest” solution is sending mail. “Just send me mail with that link and password” or “I’ll send you the path to my presentation on the network drive Z“. Such solution system can exist over several month till the information lost is grows so much till nobody definitely know where the particular and actual information is, who responsible for what and s. o. But that was good scenario. In the worst case such mail routing can be established forever!
I such mail brokerage scenario some people start to organize the information on their own, they build up diagrams directories structures and other documents on their local machines. That result in redundancy and inconsistency in between such privates archives.
But sometimes there are some better managers at work, at some points a smart manager begin to think about optimisation and improvement of knowledge management that is usually results in the “invention” of centralization of information. And that’s all. At this stage the solution for the problem is clear “we just need central storage and every body has to write his part of the knowledge down there“.
The centralization is in fact is high improvement a t this point. It eliminates inconsistency and redundancy, it clarifies the responsibilities for the parts of the content and everybody know where to search.
Unfortunately management has not think just a half step further. So some centralization tool was taken which one of them has known by name. My doubts wasn’t taken serious because I was new in team. Responsible person rejects with: ” I don’t wanna have any tooling discussion“.
However the documentation is still incomplete. In the central storage we have many incomplete places and information that is there, is mostly relative sparse and just some kind of copy paste of some presentations or personal notices. Not really the wisdom of the team ;). There is a luck of trust and acceptance for that tool, because it’s not modern and it’s presents the information as one big list.
So why just don’t take a simple Wiki which is designed to order some fuzzy information which is edited by many users. Just because You know nothing about it? Then liston to competent people in your team!
P.S. For some days I found I my calender the invitation to “Tooling discussion” meeting. What a surprise. ![]()


















There is a ton of theoretical articles about